Subaru Outback vs. Forester in the Kenyan Market (2018–2019)
Share
Performance & Vehicle Characteristics
Ground Clearance & Ride Configuration
- Both the Outback and Forester offer a strong 8.7 inches (≈ 220 mm) ground clearance, ideal for rough or uneven Kenyan terrains.
- In their Wilderness trims, the Outback slightly leads with 9.5 in, versus Forester’s 9.2 in.
Cabin & Cargo Space
- The Forester tends to offer marginally more passenger headroom and a higher roofline, enhancing visibility and cabin space.
- Outback boasts superior cargo layout; its elongated body better accommodates oversized items like bikes without removing wheels.
Safety & Technology
- Both models leverage Subaru’s Symmetrical AWD for superior traction and stability.
- The advanced EyeSight suite—including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping—has been standard on both since 2021 globally, with strong adoption before that in various trims.
Platform & Comfort
- The 2018 Forester adopted Subaru’s Global Platform, resulting in better ride comfort, improved cabin space, refined NVH (noise, vibration, harshness), and added safety robustness.
- Outback continues to deliver a smooth, refined ride with ample family utility—especially appealing for long journeys or corporate use.
Market Position & Buyer Insights
| Feature | Subaru Outback (2018–19) | Subaru Forester (2018–19) |
|---|---|---|
| Cargo Space | Excellent, elongated layout—great for gear | Slightly less but still spacious |
| Roof & Headroom | Lower roofline | Taller cabin, better visibility |
| Off-road Edge | Slightly higher clearance in Wilderness trim | Strong standard clearance, roof visibility |
| Comfort & Platform | Refined ride, good for commuting & travel | Comfortable with new platform enhancements |
| Safety Tech | EyeSight and AWD available | Same advanced safety package available |
Fuel Economy: Which Subaru Saves More at the Pump?
In a market like Kenya where fuel prices are constantly rising, fuel economy is a critical factor for buyers. Here’s how the 2018–2019 Subaru Outback and Subaru Forester compare:
| Model & Engine Variant | Fuel Type | Average Consumption (L/100km) | KM/L Estimate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outback 2.5L (Non-turbo) | Petrol | ~8.7 – 9.0 | 11–11.5 KM/L | Most common variant in Kenya |
| Outback 3.6R (6-cylinder) | Petrol | ~10.5 – 11.0 | 9–9.5 KM/L | More power, lower economy |
| Forester 2.0L (Non-turbo) | Petrol | ~7.9 – 8.5 | 12–13 KM/L | Efficient and agile |
| Forester 2.0XT (Turbo) | Petrol | ~9.5 – 10.0 | 10–10.5 KM/L | Sportier, but thirstier |
Real-World Driving in Kenya
- Forester has a slight edge in urban fuel efficiency, especially in stop-and-go Nairobi traffic.
- Outback performs better on highways or long-distance routes like Nairobi–Mombasa or Nairobi–Kisumu, due to its cruise efficiency and larger engine coasting power.
🔧 Maintenance Tip:
- Kenyan fuel quality and road conditions mean regular servicing and using high-quality engine oil will impact long-term fuel economy more than in developed markets.
Verdict: Fuel Economy Winner?
Winner: Subaru Forester (2.0L)
It offers better mileage in urban settings and is cheaper to fuel for everyday commutes.
But if your driving involves long highway trips, towing, or heavy cargo—then the Outback's bigger engine can actually be more efficient at maintaining steady speed, despite slightly higher fuel use
Conclusion & Recommendation
For Akira Auto Imports, tailoring your customer guidance can highlight:
- Outback (2018–2019): Ideal for buyers prioritizing cargo flexibility, long-distance comfort, and a touch of premium appeal—particularly in well-equipped trims.
- Forester (2018–2019): Best suited for clients looking for cost-effective AWD performance, higher cabin space, and urban-to-off-road versatility without the premium price.
Both models uphold Subaru’s reputation for reliability and sporty practicality—making either a solid pick in Kenya’s varied driving environment.